Unbelievable: Oreshnik Caused No Damage? Satellite Proof Analyzed

Unbelievable: Oreshnik Caused No Damage? Satellite Proof Analyzed

283.968 Lượt nghe
Unbelievable: Oreshnik Caused No Damage? Satellite Proof Analyzed
Chapters: 00:00 How Oreshnik exploded in popularity in Russia 01:49 What is Oreshnik and what happened during its attack on Dnipro? 05:25 Is Oreshnik really a hypersonic weapon? 06:26 Is Oreshnik impossible to intercept? 10:27 The target of Oreshnik was a secret factory: Pivdenmash 13:17 Oreshnik caused no visible damage at Pivdenmash 17:23 How much damage can Oreshnik's submunitions deliver? 20:05 Can Oreshnik penetrate deep underground? 22:12 Is a non-nuclear Oreshnik as powerfull as a nuclear-armed missile? 23:37 How Oreshnik could start an accidental nuclear war 24:14 How accurate is Oreshnik? 25:37 Why did Russia use Oreshnik, and did it work? Is Oreshnik (RS-26 Rubezh) Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile what Russians claim it to be? Or is it more of a PR show? or both? We investigated this story, and the result is #NotWhatYouThink #NWYT Links: Amerikanetz Blog Post: https://www.amerikanets.com/p/mea-maxima-culpa Daniel Davis & Ted Postol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKS7OYZoVdE Music: Pressure Drop - Max Anson Errors Expected - The Fly Guy Five For Those Who Fight - Dream Cave Spook - JH Coleman Checked In - Jay Varton The Ladder - Anthony Earls Primary Code - Max Anson Head Games - Max Anson_2 Human Missile - Craft Case Get Out - Alec Slayne In the News - Marten Moses Otherworld - Lama House In the News - Marten Moses Just the Right Amount - Arthur Benson Down the Alleyway - Damon Greene Sidelined - Dip Diet No Stone Unturned - Brendon Moeller Skipping Class - Birdies Dark Mind - Wendel Scherer Covert Affairs - Christoffer Moe Ditlevsen Lunch Break in Milan - Trabant 33 Footage: Select images/ videos from Getty Images Shutterstock Pivdenmash Ukrainian Ministry of Defense Russian Ministry of Defense US Department of Defense Note: "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."