The Catastrophic Failure Of VAR

The Catastrophic Failure Of VAR

166 Lượt nghe
The Catastrophic Failure Of VAR
VAR was supposed to fix football. It was meant to eliminate blatant mistakes, ensure fairness, and bring precision to the game. Instead, it has become a chaotic mess of inconsistent decisions, tedious stoppages, and controversial calls that still get it wrong. From ghost goals to invisible offsides, VAR has turned football into a bureaucratic nightmare—one where fans can’t even celebrate goals properly anymore. So how did we go from demanding technology in football to begging for the old days of human error? In this video, we dive deep into: ⚽ The biggest VAR blunders that changed football history ⚽ How automated offside technology is fixing the Champions League—but the Premier League rejected it (until now) ⚽ The real reason referees still get it wrong (and why VAR might not be the problem after all) ⚽ Can VAR actually be saved? Or is it ruining football forever? And if you think VAR is just about bad decisions, think again. Because there’s a much bigger issue at play here… and Mikel Arteta found out the hard way. Watch until the end to see how he exposed corrupt referees in the Premier League—and paid the price. 🔔 Subscribe for more deep dives into football’s biggest controversies. 👍 Like the video if you think VAR has ruined football. 💬 Comment below: Do you think VAR can ever be fixed? #VAR #Football #PremierLeague RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a "fair use" of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." This video and our YouTube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above. Fair Dealing: Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (UK) section 30 states "Fair dealing" with a work for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another work, does not infringe any copyright in the work provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Copyright in a work is not infringed by the use of a quotation from the work (whether for criticism or review or otherwise).-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------