body positivity has REBRANDED into body HYPOCRISY with “glow ups”

a case study 📝 get The Paperlike screen protector here: https://paperlike.com/maealicesuzuki/2503 🫖 the body positivity movement was built on the backs of women’s insecurities, enabling and exploiting millions under the guise of body representation, self love and acceptance… ultimately it was a failure, and yet somehow it just got worse. why are these “role models” who perpetuated the movement, now conveniently moving the goalpost of their activism to suit their own needs by rebranding, and then claiming to be victimized by their own audience after abandoning them? i have some questions 😀 my newsletter + travel with me this june (final spots left!): https://maealicesuzuki.com join my memberships to gain access to perks: https://patreon.com/maealicesuzuki https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHQ0GPGhqjinKm-Y9DLC3hw/join my socials: https://instagram.com/maealicesuzuki https://tiktok.com/@maealiccesuzuki https://twitter.com/maealicesuzuki https://discord.gg/AHPZWV4aZk podcast on spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/15i9Bj4m2xVhaZbdjCFkfZ?si=821d5e68880c444b I misspoke at 20:17. What I meant to say is, I don't have to accept what I don't like. chapters: 0:00 - Glow Ups & Image Crisis 3:42 - Personal Brands, Social Responsibility 7:09 - Lizzo’s Fat Activism & Rebrand Fail 11:53 - Is Body Neutrality The Right Answer? 15:22 - Clara Dao’s Controversies 19:23 - My Body Image Insecurity 23:26 - BoPo Hypocrisy & Betrayal 24:33 - Body Positivity Is Over, What Now? Copyright Disclaimer: Under section 107 of the copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for FAIR USE for purpose such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statues that might otherwise be infringing.