A Completely Pointless Refutation of the Englund Gambit

What's the point of this odd variation? I mean... you could... but why? In the video, Jonathan Schrantz explores the Englund Gambit and points out an interesting but not entirely necessary refutation of this popular gambit. Analyze the main game for yourself: https://lichess.org/W30sgSTqQEqA ♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙ ♖♘♗♕♔♗♘♖ NAKHMANSON GAMBIT CHESSABLE COURSE ► ► www.chessable.com/nakhmanson-gambit/course/51578 ♟︎♟︎♟︎♟︎♟︎♟︎♟︎♟︎ ♜♞♝♛♚♝♞♜ WATCH ME LIVE ►► www.twitch.tv/vampirechicken Second channel ►► www.youtube.com/channel/UCGYOTPRRtTJ5wnQbffC7YhQ Discord ►► https://discord.gg/7M5jMTfVpm Lichess ►► https://lichess.org/@/zolpi Support my content ►► https://paypal.me/jonathanschrantz